Fatcow Icon
Brecheen discusses Personhood Act
by Josh Brecheen, The Conservative Voice
Feb 25, 2012 | 2648 views | 3 3 comments | 52 52 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Josh Brecheen
Josh Brecheen
slideshow
Last week, the Senate approved an important measure that’d I’d like to discuss this week as there is some misunderstanding surrounding the measure. Senate Bill 1433, creates the Personhood Act, which affirms that life begins at conception.

Passing this bill was an important step for the Oklahoma Legislature given the other kinds of pro-life legislation we must debate and consider.

It’s hard to decide on other issues when you haven’t even established the basis of when life begins. This is something that other legislatures have already done.

As a legislative body, our most important responsibility is to protect and ensure the safety of our citizens, and that includes the unborn.

Legally, it’s important that the Oklahoma Legislature make this strong, clear statement that we will protect our state’s children. This helps lay the foundation to help protect the unborn to the fullest extent permitted under U.S. Supreme Court precedents.

At the time, the Supreme Court stated that they didn’t need to resolve the difficult question of when life begins, but we feel that question is key to addressing this issue. SB 1433 is only a statement, but it is well within the rights of a state legislative body to offer such a counter argument that will hopefully change the cultural acceptance of a practice that has led to the destruction of 54 million U. S. lives since 1973.

This same law has been on the books for 23 years in Missouri, and has helped provide remedies for injuries to children in the womb in contexts other than abortion, such as criminal and civil penalties for assaulting a pregnant woman.

The constitutionality of the Missouri law was upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in the 1989 Webster decision.

Having said all of this, the Personhood Act does not outlaw abortion as that is an act protected by the U.S. Supreme Court, and the Supremacy Clause gives that Court the final say over Oklahoma laws. So until the membership of the Supreme Court changes, it’s unlikely that Oklahoma will be able to pass any laws that prevent abortion. The bill also doesn’t prohibit birth control or in vitro fertilization as opponents of the Act have claimed. It doesn’t set any penalties or any kind of enforcements or regulations.

The Personhood Act is simply the Oklahoma Legislatures way of expressing our state’s values.

We want it to be known that Oklahoma values human life prior to birth. We speak and fight for those who don’t have a voice and can’t fight for themselves.

This bill also has great educational value. Most in society relate laws to what is right, and they help guide people’s actions. Laws can shift people’s moral compasses so to speak.

Though essentially this bill doesn’t change any laws in our state, it does bring the issue to the forefront of citizens’ minds.

Those of us who are pro-life want to open the hearts and minds of those who aren’t and make them realize that abortion is not a victimless act. There are many in our society who have become cold to the fact that abortion is indeed ending a life.

I recently heard the procedure eloquently and perfectly described as an act that stops one heart and breaks another. There are two victims in abortions.

Not only does it affect the life that will never be, but it’s a decision that will haunt the mother the rest of her life regardless of the situation that brought about her pregnancy.

To contact me at the Capitol, please write to Senator Josh Brecheen, State Capitol, 2300 N. Lincoln Blvd. Room 513A, Oklahoma City, OK, 73105, email me at brecheen@oksenate.gov, or call (405) 521-5586.

Comments
(3)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Docprice
|
April 11, 2012
Hmmm, a "lifesaving medical procedure?" I guess that in a very small fraction of circumstances, abortion can be looked at that way. However, in every single circumstance, it can be looked at as a life taking medical procedure. It's going to be a tough decision in those infrequent instances (by infrequent, I refer to the instances where the mother's life is at stake versus the instances where the baby is killed just because it isn't wanted), but in every one of those situations, there is a life that is given no decision making power. Your last question is a dandy. "Reproductive choices?" Is the killing of a baby a "reproductive choice?"
SuzyWeber
|
March 01, 2012
It amazes me that you can make a blanket statement such as "a decision that will haunt the mother the rest of her life..." Really, what about the women that made the decision because it was the right one for them and not only are they not haunted, they are perfectly fine with that decision? What about the husbands that did not lose a wife because that woman's life was saved due to the fact that abortion was a lifesaving medical procedure? Do you have nothing better to do than be involved in a woman's reproductive choices?

Weather
Sponsored By:

Lottery
Sponsored By:

Stocks
Sponsored By:

Gas Prices
Sponsored By:

Featured Businesses
Recipes
Sponsored By: